You begin the article by making it clear that you do not like ACB's personal lifestyle and religious choices. Then you move on to describe a tragic case of a young man's untimely death. You conclude that all federal judges would have behaved in exactly the same manner as ACB in this case ruling. A liberal judge wrote the decision against taking the case, not ACB. So why exactly does any of this matter? There is little evidence of legal knowledge here, only evidence of personal animus.